Joe Biden Served 8 years as Vice President under Barack Obama and it seemed like he was Invisible except for the 6 or so times he visited the Ukraine?
Wake Up America…
“Truth is akin to Cool as Both are Repulsive to the Un. But, when Ignorance is Ignored; Stupidity is Justified… “— Robert Karpie
How Did They Get Away with This?
Hillary Clinton sold 20 percent of America’s uranium to Russia and then “the Russian government gave $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.” And, Former FBI Director and special counsel Robert Mueller is accused of bragging that he — “delivered it.” ?
Congressman address open statement to American people about his shame and disgust with Bill Clinton in regards to then President Bill Clinton’s blatant involvement with CHINA’S THEFT OF NUCLEAR SECRETS in disguise as getting US satellite technology for weather monitoring.
Mr. INHOFE. Mr. President, I want you to listen. I am going to tell you a story of espionage, conspiracy, deception, and coverup, a story with life and death implications for millions of Americans, a story about national security, and a President and an administration that deliberately chose to put national security at risk, while telling everyone that everything was fine.
If it was written in a book, Mr. President, it wouldn’t sell, because no one would believe it. If it was fictionalized in a novel, few could conceive it. But it is true.
For the sake of my statement today, I am stating that the President withheld information and covered up the Chinese theft of our technology. But I am realistic enough to know that a person with the history of deception this President has will have provided himself with some cover in case he got caught. So I am sure there is a paper trail that he can allege. The way the President probably covered himself was to include tidbits about this theft buried in briefings of 40 or 50 other items so the significance of it would not be noticed. But a paper trail would be established.
Anticipating that, I, over the weekend, talked to the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Congressman Porter Goss, and the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee at the time of the discovery of this secret, this information, Senator Arlen Specter. Neither chairman was notified of the W-88 nuclear warhead technology theft. And these would have been the first to be notified, Mr. President.
There can be no doubt that President Clinton engaged in a coverup scheme.
Let me read three paragraphs from last week’s op-ed article by Michael Kelly in the Washington Post, entitled `Lies About China.’ I am quoting now, Mr. President:
In April 1996, Energy Department officials informed Samuel Berger, then Clinton’s deputy national security advisor, that Notra Trulock, the department’s chief of intelligence, had uncovered evidence that showed China had learned how to miniaturize nuclear bombs, allowing for smaller, more lethal warheads . . .
The Times reports that the House Intelligence Committee asked Trulock for a briefing in July 1998. Trulock asked for permission from Elizabeth Moler, then acting energy secretary. According to Trulock, Moler told him not to brief the committee because the information might be used against Clinton’s China policy. . .
The White House’s secret would have remained secret
had it not been for a select investigative committee headed by Republican [Representative] Christopher Cox. . .
But even using the President’s fictitious paper trail, the earliest either chairman could have known about it would have been late in the spring of 1997, years after the Clinton administration learned of it and, of course, after the 1996 election.
I start, Mr. President, by listing a few things which we now know to be true, factual, incontrovertible, and nonclassified.
For years, the Clinton administration covered up China’s interest of top secret U.S. nuclear weapons data. They never informed the Congress or the American people about what had happened or its significance to our national security.
Let me tell you what President Clinton did during this period of time.
During this period of time, the President misled the American people on numerous occasions about the threat posed by strategic nuclear missiles in the post-cold-war era.
During this period of time, President Clinton made statements on over 130 separate occasions, such as the following:–and I am quoting–
For the first time since the dawn of the nuclear age, there is not a single solitary nuclear missile pointed at an American child tonight. Not one. Not a single one.
During this period of time, he knew that China was targeting up to 18 intercontinental ballistic missiles at American children.
During this period of time, President Clinton signed export control waivers which allowed his top campaign fundraisers’ aerospace company to transfer sensitive U.S. missile guidance technology to China.
During this period of time, he shifted the prime satellite export responsibility from the State Department, where it had always been to maintain security, to the Commerce Department so that it would be easier to share sensitive information with the Chinese and others.
During this period of time, President Clinton hosted over 100 White House fundraisers as a part of a larger aggressive scheme to raise campaign contributions, many from illegal foreign sources primarily, including sources in China. Among guests permitted to attend these White House fundraisers were a convicted felon and a Chinese arms dealer.
During this period of time, John Huang, Charlie Trie, Johnny Chung, James Riady, and others with strong ties to China, were deeply involved, with the President’s knowledge, in raising Chinese-tainted campaign cash for the Clinton campaign.
During this period of time, John Huang, who had been given a security clearance without a background check, was permitted to receive numerous classified CIA briefings, both during and after his stay at the Commerce Department.
And during this period of time, President Clinton was successfully stopping the deployment of a national missile defense system–exposing every American life to a missile attack, leaving us with no defense whatsoever against an intercontinental ballistic missile.
Mr. President, China’s theft of secret data on the so-called W-88 nuclear warhead may be one of the most serious breaches of national security in the history of our Nation, more serious than Aldrich Ames; perhaps more serious than the Rosenbergs.
The public needs to understand that this story is true. This is not about partisanship. It is not about some ancient history of some long gone cold war.
This is about the real world here and now. It is about national security in its most important aspects. It is about protecting our freedom and our existence as a Nation.
This is ultimately a matter which concerns the life and death of every American citizen.
The W-88 is the most advanced nuclear warhead in the U.S. arsenal and is carried on top of a Trident submarine-launched ballistic missile. This is the cornerstone weapon of our Nation’s nuclear deterrent. As many as 8 can fit on top of a submarine-launched missile; as many as 10 can fit on top of a land-based missile–either ours or China’s. We are talking about a miniaturized warhead much smaller in size than the Hiroshima atomic bomb but 10 times more powerful.
This chart appeared in the New York Times on March 6 of this year. The first atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima weighed almost 9,000 pounds, yielded 15 kilotons and was dropped from a plane. By contrast, the modern W-88 is more powerful than this. It is 2.6 feet in length and weighs about 300 pounds and yields up to 150 kilotons. Several fit into the head of one missile. The technology on which it is built is super top secret and represents billions of dollars and years, if not decades, of investment on the part of dedicated scientists and engineers working in the supreme American national interest.
Some ask, why does America have such a weapon? Because it is part of our responsibility as a world superpower to have the most advanced, efficient, and credible nuclear deterrent, not only to protect our own freedom but the freedom of our allies. It is part of our policy of peace through strength.
I think about my friend from Texas, the Senator who is always talking about how we want to see the day when the lion and the lamb lie down together. But when that happens, we want to make sure we are the lion and not the lamb. We don’t intend to use any of these nuclear weapons. It is a fact of life, in the most dangerous world we live in, we have to be prepared to deter any potential adversary.
The W-88 allows for multiple warheads to be placed on one missile. With this technology, China will now be able to put up to 10 warheads on a single long-range missile. Each warhead is targeted at a different city, each city subject to an explosion 10 times as great as that which destroyed Hiroshima at the end of World War II.
Mr. President, I am from Oklahoma. I can remember in 1995 when the bomb went off. It was a truck bomb. A 4,800-pound truck bomb destroyed the Murrah Office Building, maiming and killing 168 Oklahomans. I remember standing out there and watching the police and the firemen enter the building where there was no security and pulling out parts of bodies and bodies. It was the most devastating thing I have ever experienced. It was the worst act of terrorism ever recorded on American soil. That bomb had a force of 1,000 pounds of TNT, half of 1 ton. By contrast, the Hiroshima bomb had an explosive force of 15 tons, or 30,000 times as large as the Oklahoma City bomb. The W-88, while smaller in physical size, had a force of 150 kilotons, or 300,000 times the explosion power of the Oklahoma City bomb. By carrying 10 of these, it would be 3 million times the force of the Oklahoma City bomb.
The more compact W-88 warhead makes possible what is called MIRV technology, or multiple independent reentry vehicle, which allows the missile to reenter and then go to various targets. This is technology that we thought China was many, many years away from developing on its own, and they stole this technology, and President Clinton covered it up.
We also used to think North Korea was many years away from building a long-range multiple stage rocket. I got a phone call and a letter from Henry Shelton, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, on August 24. In this letter he said he was confident we would have 3 years warning of any new long-range missile threat–that is, any new country that we already didn’t know about. Seven days later, on August 31, a multiple-stage rocket was launched in North Korea. Part of it reached the coast of Alaska.
Because of the disparity over what our nuclear threat is, in the wisdom of the House and the Senate, the Democrats and the Republicans commissioned the Rumsfeld Committee. We were charged with the responsibility of finding the nine most informed scientists and authorities on missile technology, who formed a committee for assessing the threat that we have in this country. This was a bipartisan committee, appointed jointly by Democrats and Republicans. Of the nine, five were Republican appointments and four were Democrat appointments. They concluded unanimously that when it comes to advanced missiles and weapons, with countries willing to buy, sell, and steal technology, `We live in an environment of little or no warning.’ That means we must immediately be prepared.
Last year, you may remember it was revealed that the Clinton administration had changed the approval process for high-technology satellite transfers, how waivers were granted for American companies so they could launch satellites in China. This ultimately resulted in China acquiring advanced United States missile guidance technology, making their missiles more accurate and more reliable. President Clinton personally signed the waiver allowing China to acquire this missile technology.
Let me repeat, President Clinton personally signed the waiver allowing China to achieve this missile technology.
Executives of these two corporations which benefited, Loral and Hughes, were among the largest financial creditors to President Clinton’s campaign ever but this is not important. The motive for aiding and abetting our adversaries could be money, or it could be some kind of perverted allegiance to some of these countries, or it could be just a callous disregard for the lives of American citizens. The motive is not important. The fact is, President Clinton did it and he knew exactly what he was doing.
Accompanying the transferred missile guidance technology with the stolen nuclear weapon technology, China can threaten United States cities with accurate, reliable, and horribly destructive multiple-warhead nuclear missiles. This is not science fiction. Two years ago, a high-ranking Chinese official made a statement. Two years ago, when the Chinese were trying to intimidate the elections of the Taiwanese and they were launching missiles at the Taiwan Straits, it was suggested to this high-ranking military official in China that it could be that America would come to Taiwan’s defense and would intervene. His response was, `No, they are not going to do that because America would rather defend Los Angeles than defend Taipei.’ At the very least, that is an indirect threat to use missiles on the United States of America.
By helping China develop their long-range missiles, President Clinton also helped North Korea and other rogue nations with theirs–nations like Iran. Let me read three paragraphs from last week’s Washington Times article entitled `China Assists North Korea Space Launches.’
China is sharing space technology with North Korea, a move that could boost P’yongyang’s long-range missile program, White House and Pentagon officials told the Washington Times. . . .
Another Pentagon report on the 1996 Chinese booster that failed to launch a U.S. satellite concluded that `U.S. national security was harmed’ by the improper sharing of technology with China by Hughes and other satellite maker Loral Space & Communications Ltd. . . .
Keep in mind, it was President Clinton who signed the waiver to give the Chinese this technology.
In 1994, the Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency reported that it believed China had helped design the Taepo Dong 2 missile (this is the North Korea missile) because its first stage diameter is very close in size to the Chinese CSS-2 immediate range missile.
It is factual to say that President Clinton knew he was giving our missile technology to North Korea as well as China.
I take this moment to remind my colleagues once again that America today has no defense whatever against such a threat. The Clinton administration today, despite its rhetoric, opposes the deployment of any national missile defense system. Someone who is pretty smart, back in 1983 when they determined that we would have to have a defense against an incoming missile by fiscal year 1998–that is, last year–so during the Reagan administration, then the Bush Administration, they embarked on this thing called SDI, Strategic Defense Initiative, to make sure that by 1998 we would have something to defend ourselves in the event an ICBM came over from China, from Russia, from Iran, from North Korea, from anywhere. So we were on schedule to have this deployed by fiscal year 1998.
Well, in 1993, that came to a screeching halt when President Clinton vetoed the defense authorization bill and vetoed all further efforts, including the bills that were introduced to put us on line with the national missile defense system. As an excuse for this, he said he had to protect the integrity of the 1972 ABM Treaty. Let me remind you that treaty was not a Democrat-inspired treaty. That was Republican-inspired; it was President Nixon and Henry Kissinger. The idea was that we had two superpowers, the U.S.S.R. and the United States of America. So we made a deal with them. Under the ABM Treaty, we said we won’t defend ourselves, and you don’t defend yourselves, and that way, if they launch a missile that goes to us, we launch one that goes back to them and everybody dies. I didn’t like that theory back then, but it made sense when there were two superpowers. That is not true today.
Today, virtually every country has a weapon of mass destruction. We have missiles that we are finding that now even North Korea has. China is exchanging technology and systems with Iran and other countries like that. So there is a proliferation of missiles as well as weapons of mass destruction. I have to say that the mutual assured destruction concept which was adopted at that time has no relevance today. Even Henry Kissinger, who was the architect of the ABM Treaty of 1972 said, `It’s nuts to make a virtue out of our vulnerability.’ He said we should not be looking at that. Besides, somebody should remind the President that was a treaty that was made in 1972, and it was made between the United States and the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union no longer exists. So I have to say that President Clinton is solely responsible for the fact that we are totally defenseless against an incoming ICBM from China or any other place in the world.
Now, Mr. President, from news reports, this is some of what we know about China’s theft of our nuclear secrets. Apparently, a spy at the Los Alamos weapons lab succeeded in transferring data on this highly classified W-88 warhead technology to China in the mid-1980s. That was not during the current administration; nobody refutes that. But our Government did not find out about it until April of 1995. That is 3 years into the Clinton administration.
This is a critical date, Mr. President. We did not know about the theft until April of 1995. Detection came when experts analyzed data from then-recent Chinese underground nuclear tests and saw remarkable similarities to the W-88 U.S. warhead to what they were experimenting with. Later in 1995, secret Chinese Government documents confirmed that there had been a security breach at Los Alamos. That was in 1995.
Deputy National Security Advisor Sandy Berger was first briefed about it. President Clinton did not respond then because he was obviously a little preoccupied with what he considered to be more important matters at that time. After all, there were White House fundraisers to host, foreign campaign contributions, satellite transfers to approve, high technology trade with China to promote and, of course, an election to be won–at all costs. Mr. Berger was well aware of all this. We know that he sat in on strategy sessions for the campaign for 1996.
So this was also the time when President Clinton was running around the country telling audiences that `for the first time since the dawn of the nuclear age, there is not a single, solitary nuclear missile pointed at an American child tonight. Not one. Not a single one.’ Of course everybody cheered, wanting to believe he was telling the truth.
Of all the lies this President has told, this is the most egregious of all.
He repeated this misleading, deceptive lie over 130 times between 1995 and 1997, right at the very time he and his national security advisors knew that this horrible breach of nuclear security had occurred and was under investigation. It was also at that very time that he knew that up to 18 American cities were being targeted by Chinese long-range missiles, missiles that had and have the potential of killing millions of Americans. During this time, he said 130 times: `For the first time since the dawn of the nuclear age, there is not a single, solitary nuclear missile pointed at an American child tonight. Not one. Not a single one.’
So while the American people consume his misleading and dishonest public statements–helping to secure his reelection –nothing was done for over a year about the security breach at Los Alamos.
The likely suspect spy was identified in early 1997, and the FBI urged that he at least be transferred to a less sensitive position. But inexplicably, he was allowed to keep his sensitive job at Los Alamos for a another year and a half. This was the spy who was responsible for the theft, and President Clinton kept him in that sensitive job for another year and a half. Finally, he was fired by Energy Secretary Richardson last Monday–a week ago today, March 8, 1999–but only after he was publicly identified in news reports as having failed two previous lie detector tests.
In all of this, was Congress ever informed? As a Member of
the Senate Armed Services Committee and the Senate Intelligence Committee, I certainly was not. As I said earlier, I talked to the chairmen of both the House Intelligence Committee and the Senate Intelligence Committee and they weren’t informed either.
Did the President ever take the appropriate aggressive and timely steps that should have been taken in order to protect the national security interest in the wake of this matter? No, he did not.
Why? Why the delays? Why the lack of consultation and communication? Why the seeming indifference to this very, very serious breach of national security? We will be asking some tough questions about this in the days to come. I note that the Armed Services Committee will have a hearing on this, and the Intelligence Committee will have a hearing the day after tomorrow, Wednesday. We will have a lot of questions. The American people need to know what is going on here.
The President’s National Security Advisor, Mr. Berger, has a lot to answer for here. He had better be prepared to answer questions from Members of Congress honestly, forthrightly, and without intention to deceive, mislead, or change the meaning of words. Otherwise, he should resign now and take the rap for President Clinton.
I am convinced that we have not yet scratched the surface of the national security scandal exposed by these most recent revelations.
This administration obviously wanted nothing to interfere with developing good relations with China. While it was soliciting and accepting campaign contributions from China, it was dragging its feet on investigating the most egregious espionage operation China had ever succeeded in pulling off in the U.S., a breach of security which could potentially put the lives of millions of Americans at great risk.
This is, without doubt, the worst example yet of how this administration has put its own selfish motives above the national security interests of this country and above the protection of American lives.
The American people and the Congress must demand that the President be held accountable for this gross dereliction of duty. I guess the question is, What can we do? We are Members of Congress and what can we do? I am not sure there is anything we can do except inform the American people and let public outrage solve the problem. And why are we in Congress so limited in what we can do?
Our Founding Fathers never envisioned we would have a President who would do these kinds of things and act in these ways. This is why the Constitution gives the President great latitude of action in carrying out his duties and why he is protected from the other branches of Government under the separation of powers.
When John Adams wrote to his wife after the first night he spent in the White House in 1799, he spoke of the expectations of all the founders during that time: `May only honest and wise men rule under this roof.’ The White House.
There was an assumption that the American people would always elect Presidents with a basic level of morality, honesty and integrity, who out of patriotism would always put the welfare of the country above any personal ambitions for power or glory.
This President knew he was covering up information vital to the safety and well-being of every American–that China had stolen from us the advanced technology which would give them the capability to kill millions of Americans in multiple cities with just one missile, and he knew it.
In 1945, World War II was ended when the atomic bombs were dropped in Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Each explosion destroyed an entire city, killing tens of thousands. The death toll in Hiroshima was about 75,000 lives from that 15-ton nuclear bomb.
Just think, that with the technology that this President has transferred to China and what China has stolen and the President has covered up, China is now capable of producing a 150-kiloton bomb small enough to fit ten of them on top of one missile, each bomb targeted at a different American city with accuracy and reliability.
Just extrapolating the numbers, that–in theory–is enough destructive power to kill as many as 7,500,000 Americans–with just one missile.
And, due to this President who stopped our national missile defense effort, we have no defense. We have a President who acts as if he doesn’t care about us.
So finally, Mr. President, let me repeat the six proven incontrovertible facts:
1. President Clinton hosted over 100 campaign fundraisers in the White House, many with Chinese connections.
2. President Clinton used John Huang, Charlie Trie, Johnny Chung, James Riady, and others with strong Chinese ties to raise campaign money.
3. President Clinton signed waivers to allow his top campaign fundraiser’s aerospace company to transfer United States missile guidance technology to China.
4. President Clinton covered up the theft of our most valuable nuclear weapons technology.
5. President Clinton lied to the American people over 130 times about our Nation’s security while he knew Chinese missiles were aimed at American children.
6. President Clinton single-handedly stopped the deployment of a national missile defense system, exposing every American life to a missile attack, leaving America with no defense whatsoever against an intercontinental ballistic missile.
Again, it doesn’t matter whether President Clinton did these things for Chinese campaign contributions because the motive for aiding and abetting our adversaries is not important. The fact is President Clinton did it and he knew exactly what he was doing.
I’m not a lawyer, Mr. President, but I have to ask, could President Clinton have been tried for impeachment for the wrong crime?
Why am I here telling the truth about the President?
I think it is because I haven’t heard anyone else do it. They know this President will lie with such conviction that the American people will continue to believe him, and they don’t want to take the risk.
I happened to go yesterday to the McLean Bible Church, and the sermon was about taking risks–being willing to take a risk. They talked about the Israelites who were in the desert, and they sent a team up to Canaan to look to see what the risk was up there. They came back, and they said: There are giants up there. We don’t have a chance. We are like mosquitoes next to them, except for Caleb.’ Caleb came back, and he said, `We should take the risks. We can win. We can fight and win.’
What happened? The rest of the story you know. You know what that is. God left the Israelites out in the desert, and he sent Caleb to the Promised Land. With all these blessings, we just do not seem to learn. I think Henry Ward Beecher said it in a different way. He said, `I don’t like those cold, precise, perfect people who, in order not to say wrong, say nothing . . . and in order not to do wrong, do nothing.’
We have a lot of people around here who are more concerned about their jobs that they would go ahead and do nothing. So somebody has to tell the truth about this President. We can’t all be appeasers. An appeaser is a guy who throws his friends to the alligators hoping they will eat him last.
Hiram Mann said, `No man survives when freedom fails, the best men rot in filthy jails, and those who cry appease, appease are hanged by those they tried to please.’
I believe that truth will ultimately prevail. It is just stubborn. Winston Churchill said, `Truth is incontrovertible. Ignorance may deride it, panic may resent it, malice may destroy it, but there it is.’
Mr. President, everything I have said during the course of the last 30 minutes is absolutely proven and true. I hope America is listening. We have a nation to save from this President.
Mr. HATCH addressed the Chair.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The distinguished Senator from Utah is recognized.
Mr. HATCH. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that I be permitted to speak for 15 minutes and that immediately following my remarks Senator Hollings be recognized.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
The Senator is recognized.
Mr. HATCH. I thank the Chair.
It is hard to deny or ignore all the ‘Fake News’ —- that interferes with Truth, Justice and the Rule of Law. Unfortunately, the Fourth Estate was designed to maintain Power and Social Control as it Protects —‘The Swamp’ and it’s Established so called ‘POWERs that Be. Unfortunately,It is all part of a planned design.Meanwhile, Humanity is but a Dream as deception and corruption— deprive Mankind of their God given Human Rights in their pursuit of Happiness.
Alas, North Korean’s leader Kim Jong Un was not acting alone in route to Nuclear Power. He is but a Pawn. He played his part well. But, he had a lot of Help over the years; thanks to a ‘Special AGENDA’; comprised from— Fear, Intimidation, Regulations and a—NEW World ORDER; backed by the United Nations and it’s Agenda 21.
Wake Up! Times are are changing.
Did Kim Jong Un see a light ahead of his destiny? Is there Hope.
Ironically, there are so many skeptics and naysayers. But then again, who or what are their motives? Will North Korea continue to show it’s good-will in the Name of Peace?
Rumors continue and will always continue.
Why Did Kim Jong Un decline President Trump’s Good-Will Faith Offer for an International Ping-Pong Challenge, while they are still negotiating all the details?
They could have raise a lot of monet to feed his people?
Is it true that Mr.Jong Un is afraid that he might need to obtain Special Permission from Robert Mueller, Super Ex-FBI Agent James Comey, ‘CROOKED HILLARY’ and Barry Soetoro ?
Are We the People Brain-Dead?
Follow the MONEY...
God Bless AMERICA..
BELIEVE — God Has His Own Divine Plan
Check it out here
CBD (Cannabidiol) is one of the 150+ naturally occurring Phytocannabinoids found in certain strains of hemp and in all cannabis plant strains. It is legal in many places and is used in the management and treatment of chronic pain, PTSD, anxiety, anxiety disorder, depression, diabetes type 1, diabetes type 2, seizures, and in conjunction with allopathic approaches to diseases including cancer chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Anecdotally CBD is being used with positive results by patients for almost every illness.
CBD, unlike Δ9-THC (Tetrahydrocannabinol), is a non psycho-active compound of cannabis. It’s use and popularity as an alternative to pharmaceutical drugs is growing worldwide despite difficulties, ambiguities and, in some cases, contradictory legal status in some states and countries.
In the USA the consumption of CBD hemp oil is federally legal, since CBD hemp oil falls under the same importation and commerce laws as other hemp products. Some US states have not enacted legislation specifically relating to CBD hemp oil and continue to use high THC cannabis laws to govern the status of CBD. At the same time many states have legislated to legalize or decriminalize cannabis.
Most states have detailed information relating to the legal status of recreational cannabis, CBD, and what is increasingly referred to as ‘medicinal cannabis’. up-to-date state specific info can be seen at Legal history of cannabis in the United States (in Notes).
In 1939 Irishman William Brooke O’Shaughnessy introduced cannabis extract to American pharmacies and thus began it’s popularity as a remedy. A wide range of cannabis extracts became freely available and could be gotten from travelling doctors, ‘snake oil salesmen’, and apothecaries across America and Europe.
The general lack of controls and regulation at the time lead to some deaths and injuries linked back to supposed cannabis extracts. Unscrupulous makers produced formulations that were of questionable quality for quick profits and some cases the ingredients were toxic or poisonous. This unfortunate practice was widespread across the profitable field of medicine and remedies.
As result, in 1906, The Pure Food and Drug Act was passed by the United States Congress. It required that certain special drugs, including cannabis extracts, be properly and correctly labeled with contents. Prior to this many drugs were marketed as ‘patented’ medicines with ‘secret ingredients’. The new regulations, however, did nothing to stem criticism about the availability of narcotics in particular and around 1910 there was a new round of legislation aimed to strengthen requirements for their sale and remove ‘loopholes’ in poison laws.
The 1910 revisions were designed to restrict all narcotics, including cannabis, as poisons therefore requiring a doctors prescription and limiting sales to pharmacies only. The first instance of the 1906 Act was enacted by the District of Columbia in the same year as ‘An act to regulate the practice of pharmacy and the sale of poisons in the District of Columbia, and for other purposes’. The act was again updated in 1938 to the Federal Pure Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act of 1938 which is still current as of the early 21st century. To date, marijuana remains under this law defined as a “dangerous drug”.
CBD as a separate substance or as an ingredient of other products is legal across the USA since it is a hemp extract however when purchasing people should check their specific local and national laws.
True Pundit personnel, who have served in varying intelligence capacities and agencies for the United States, were floored this morning when combing the Wikileaks database of John Podesta emails.
Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, in a Feb. 9, 2016 email makes reference to an assassination. Using the term “wet work,” Podesta sent a cryptic email to Democratic strategist and heavyweight consultant Steve Elmendorf. The term wet work is an intelligence slang term with Russian roots. Defined it means to assassinate a public figure, diplomat or someone of political note.
Elmendorf replied to Podesta’s mysterious reference:
“I am all in Sounds like it will be a bad nite , we all need to buckle up and double down”
We do not want to go down the conspiracy rabbit hole here based on one or two comments. However, Podesta’s email was sent on a Tuesday. By Friday, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court Antonin Scalia was found dead at a remote Texas resort. To say Scalia’s death was suspicious is putting it mildly.
We are not alleging Podesta or Elmendorf played a role in Scalia’s death. That is a large leap and making such a leap is how news sites get a reputation for spreading conspiracy theories. But neither are doing themselves any favors by discussing the topic via email either. And the timing cannot be ignored, even by partisan detectives. Simply put: The optics look very bad.
When public officials and Beltway insiders, especially those working for Hillary Clinton, start and correspond to an assassination-themed email thread, they open themselves up wide for criticisms. Likewise this is the definition of poor judgment by both parties, discussing anything related, jokingly or not, to assassination. Podesta, after all, is running a campaign for the presidency of the United States and therefore his communications are held to a higher standard. And in a functioning Republic where law and order prevail, the FBI would want some answers too to the questions were are posing here. Any competent investigator would, based on the troubling timing alone. But, not Director James Comey’s FBI. Not this FBI.
Just a week ago it seemed likewise unbelievable that Clinton would seek to kill Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange with a military drone per True Pundit. The main stream media quickly labeled the meticulously-documented report as just another right-wing conspiracy ginned up to boost Donald Trump. Until Clinton said she couldn’t recall calling for Assange’s alleged assassination.
If Scalia was in fact murdered, it will remain a secret under this current regime and a subsequent Clinton presidency. That’s not a conspiracy theory.
Here is a copy of the full email.
Under a Hillary Clinton regime, President Barack Obama will replace deceased Associate Justice Antonin Scalia and Attorney General Loretta Lynch will replace soon-to-retire Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court of the United States, according to White House and Justice Department insiders.
And you thought you’d almost seen the last of President Obama on the national stage. Think again.
According to White House sources, Obama has confided to key insiders that the reason he chose to reside in Washington. D.C. after his second term, and not Hawaii as originally planned, is because Clinton has promised him the now open chair on the Supreme Court. Now it is starting to make sense why Obama never pushed back on Merrick Garland’s nomination rebuke by the GOP-controlled Senate. Obama nominated Garland to the Supreme Court after the mysterious death of Justice Scalia in early 2016. The Senate never even considered the nomination.
The bigger surprise here is Lynch, who by many accounts has posted an even worse public record trampling the Constitution than Obama since she arrived in Washington D.C. Nonetheless, Lynch is more than just a strong rumor to replace Justice Ginsburg, according to Justice Department sources who spoke to True Pundit. Clinton has promised the job to Lynch, sources said, but the attorney general is still considering the offer. Will Lynch decline? Doubtful, Justice Department sources said.
Obama and Lynch on the Supreme Court. For life. Talk about a stacked court. The question now is can either pass a Senate confirmation. Whoops, we forgot Republicans have no spine so passing confirmation hearings would likely prove a breeze, regardless of Obama and Lynch’s key and corrupt roles in keeping Clinton free from criminal charges in her blatant mishandling of government emails, classified and top secret intelligence. And then there’s the Clinton Foundation’s pay to-play scheme and cover up which would likely ensnare the FBI and Justice Department as certain accomplices.
Lynch was promised the Supreme Court post in June or July, sources said, which would put the job offer right at the exact time the FBI concluded not to refer Clinton’s case to the Justice Department for criminal indictment. Coincidence?
When can we expect to see FBI Director James Comey in a Supreme Court robe?
Of course if Donald Trump wins the election in November, Clinton, Obama, Lynch and Comey might be retaining criminal defense attorneys instead of presiding over them.
Hillary Clinton has often been accused of supporting open borders based on her policy stances. Despite ample evidence, both she and her defenders have denied that she is an advocate of open-borders. However, the latest WikiLeaks document dump, which includes damning excerpts from her paid speeches to various banks including Goldman Sachs, now removes all doubt as to her position on protecting America’s borders.
In one excerpt from a speech to Italian bank Banco Itaú Clinton gave in May of 2013, the former Secretary of State explicitly talks of her support for “open trade and open borders”.
“My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, some time in the future with energy that is as green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and opportunity for every person in the hemisphere.”
Clinton earned $225,000 for the Banco Itaú speech according to her public disclosures.
The Clinton campaign believed this statement would be so damaging, it was “flagged” in an email between Tony Carrk, research director of the Clinton campaign, and Clinton Campaign Chairman John Podesta
If there had been any doubt Clinton was soft on the border, that doubt should now be lifted.
Hillary’s dangerous dream of open borders…
True Pundit has documented this expose with interviews from intelligence assets, Hillary Clinton’s personal emails, Wikileaks emails, secret Pentagon intelligence audio recordings and previously classified cables from the Defense Intelligence Agency. The intelligence garnered from these sources depict devastating overt and covert revelations of how the United States, under Clinton’s Dept. of State, secretly colluded with terrorist organizations and its leaders to implement America’s foreign policy, including:
A March 2011 email, sent to Clinton’s private email server from intelligence consultant and long-time confidant Sidney Blumenthal, details a list of U.S.-commissioned weapons supplied to Libyan “rebels.” Blumenthal’s email details egregious political and legally questionable abuses stemming from Clinton’s U.S. foreign policy in Libya.
But, as Blumenthal mentions, the United States didn’t act alone. Using the public guise of humanitarian intervention in Libya to prevent a faux massacre by the Gaddafi regime, Britain, France and Egypt acted with the U.S. to train and arm Al-Qaeda to assassinate Gaddafi and stockpile weapons to eventually ship to Syrian. Also, the United Nations and several key NATO countries, including the U.S., also assisted this rebel regime with air strikes. Gaddafi was eventually assassinated on Oct. 20, 2011 at the hands of the Libyan rebels, less than six months after Blumenthal’s email.
Blumenthal’s gem-packed intelligence briefing highlights a list of weapons commissioned by the U.S. that the Libyan “rebels” had stockpiled in Benghazi for the plot against Gaddafi.
These knowledgeable sources add that the insurgents have the following weapons stockpiled in Benghazi:
- 82 and 120 mm. mortars;
- GPZ type machine guns;
- 12.7mm. machine guns mounted on 4×4 vehicles;
- some anti-aircraft batteries type ZSU 23/2 and 23/4 as well as Man-Portable Air-Defense Systems (MANPADS) type SAM7;
- some tanks type T-72;
- Possibly some fixed wing aircraft, and
- some light transport/medium helicopters.
- A seemingly endless supply of AK47 assault rifles and ammunition (even for systems ZSU 23/4 and 23/2).
Blumental likewise details that French, British and Egyptian Special Forces troops were training the rebels inside of western Egypt and in the western suburbs of Benghazi. He likewise acknowledges that the foreign “troops are overseeing the transfer of weapons and supplies to the rebels,” a direct violation of international law and UN resolutions.
FBI interview summaries and notes, provided late Friday to the House Government Oversight and Intelligence Committees, contain allegations of a “quid pro quo” between a senior State Department executive and FBI agents during the Hillary Clinton email investigation, two congressional sources told Fox News.
“This is a flashing red light of potential criminality,” Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz of Utah, who has been briefed on the FBI interviews, told Fox News.
He said “there was an alleged quid pro quo” involving Undersecretary for Management Patrick Kennedy and the FBI “over at least one classified email.”
“In return for altering the classification, the possibility of additional slots for the FBI at missions overseas was discussed,” Chaffetz said.
As Fox News previously reported, interviews released earlier this month, known as 302s, reveal the serious allegation that Kennedy applied pressure to subordinates to change classified email codes so they would be shielded from Congress and the public. Fox News was told as far back as August 2015 that Kennedy was running interference on Capitol Hill. But Kennedy, in his FBI interview on Dec. 21, 2015, “categorically rejected” allegations of classified code tampering.
Chaffetz has not read the new documents, which include classified records that must be read in a security facility. But based on a briefing from staffers, Chaffetz said there are grounds for at least “four hearings” after the recess. Chaffetz, who is currently out of town campaigning, said allegations came from witnesses though there is some conflict in the record.
Today the FBI released another 100 pages relating to its investigation of Hillary Clinton’s conduct as Secretary of State. Why it has taken so long for the agency to review, redact and publish a very small quantity of documents is inexplicable. Be that as it may, the documents released today are explosive.
You may have seen headlines to the effect that Hillary’s State Department tried to pressure the FBI to say that various documents located on Hillary’s insecure home server were not classified. This was critical, obviously, because one of Hillary’s lines of defense was to claim, falsely, that she never sent or received classified documents on her off-the-books email system.
Those headlines are correct, but to get the full impact you really have to see the relevant portions of the FBI investigation. Here they are; in all cases, click to enlarge. But first, a description.
In the first page, an unidentified FBI employee says he was “pressured” to change the classification of an email to render it unclassified. This pressure came from someone within the FBI, who said he had been contacted by Undersecretary of State Patrick Kennedy, who “had asked his assistance in altering the email’s classification in exchange for a ‘quid pro quo.’” The quid pro quo was that, if the FBI would say the email was unclassified, the State Department would allow the FBI to “place more Agents in countries where they are presently forbidden.”
Subsequently, the interviewee was summoned to an “all agency” meeting at the State Department to discuss the classification review of the Hillary Clinton emails. This fact itself is astonishing: the meeting was attended by representatives of the State Department, the CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency “and other government agencies,” including, obviously, the FBI. Patrick Kennedy presided. Someone asked whether any of the Hillary emails that were being reviewed for production were classified. Kennedy replied, “Well, we’ll see.”
Following the all agency meeting, Undersecretary of State Kennedy renewed his effort to pressure the FBI to change its classification of the document in question. The FBI representative wouldn’t budge, so Kennedy asked who else at the agency he could talk to. The interviewee gave the name of Michael Steinbach.
The interviewee then participated in a call with Kennedy and Steinbach, in which Kennedy “continued to pressure the FBI to change the classified markings on the email to unclassified.” Steinbach refused. What happened next is–deserves to be, anyway–a bombshell.
Prior to ending the conversation, KENNEDY asked whether the FBI or STATE would conduct the public statements on the matter. STEINBACH advised KENNEDY that the FBI would not comment publicly on the matter.
That was enough for the astonishingly corrupt Hillary Clinton. This is what happened next:
The conference call ended and, according to [ ], the Associated Press (AP) published the story within the hour. Former Secretary of State Clinton appeared in front of the press shortly thereafter to deny having sent classified emails on her private email server.